Archives for the month of: February, 2005

…this week’s Reasons to Be Cheerful, Part 3.

I’ve actually been a pretty good mood all week for no specific reason that I can identify—and hey, why look a gift horse, etc.—so I wasn’t sure I was going to be able to come up with this week’s RTBC. But then, after a restless night (I’ve been sleeping terribly lately), I woke up with a pounding headache…and I can turn that into an RTBC:

1. As I was getting ready for work this morning, the pounding headache made me think, as headaches often do, of my favorite line from “Pounding Pipes,” my favorite Blood Oranges song:* “My head’s all right, not so sure about my liver.” This in turn made me think of Simon Riley, an adorable Irishman who camped out at my apartment for a month or so one summer when I was in college, along with his friend Dave Mulvaney (a true black Irishman–not “black Irish,” as dark-eyed and dark-haired Irish people are sometimes called, but a black man who was also Irish—his Jamaican father had moved to Africa, and Dave was raised in Dublin by his Irish mother). One night, Martha (my best friend through much of college), who practically lived at my apartment that summer too, and the Irish boys and I came back from the bar, a little (okay, more than a little) tipsy, and Simon was complaining about how long his hair was getting, so Martha offered to cut it. She cut it a little shorter than he wanted, and he was a little upset, so then she got upset, and everything was a little more dramatic because we were drunk, and the night ended on a less happy-drunk note than it should have.

Martha and I slept in the next day, but Simon woke up early to head to Pittsburgh, where he was meeting up with some friends. He left us a note on a napkin, a note that I have to this day, tucked safely in my treasured copy (really my mom’s, from her college days) of T.S. Eliot’s Selected Poems. The note was very funny and had a little drawing—Simon was, is an artist and illustrator—and among other things, it said “The hair is fine, the head’s a little sore.” (Actually, I think it said “hed” and “soar,” but that’s beside the point.) And he promised to bring us back a stick of Pittsburgh Rock, a joke I had to explain to Martha. I don’t know how or why I’ve kept that note for all these years, except that it reminds me of a very distinct period in my life, when I was quite literally obsessed with a boy (and that’s really a story for another day) and when Martha and I had our Edie Sedgwick summer and were joined at the hip and when the Irish came into my life.

“The Irish” were a group of early twentysomethings, a year or two older than me, whom my friend and next-door neighbor Matthew met in Ireland and invited to come visit him. Three or four of them showed up out of the blue that summer (1982), and gradually they were followed by several more; most of them spent at least their first night in the States sleeping on my floor because they’d used up all their allotted time as guests in the Columbia dorms and I became one of their contact people. They were educated, middle-class kids, but they came over with no plans, not much money, and nowhere permanent to stay, and maybe inevitably, some of them got into trouble. A few got into heroin, horrifyingly; one of them, Derek, an incredibly sweet and shy guy whom I loved to bits even though he was endlessly trying to bum money from me, died in mysterious circumstances, either jumping or being pushed onto the subway tracks as a train was pulling in. Dave ended up getting caught with drugs and deported; he can never come back to the U.S. Others did a little better, finding off-the-books jobs and living in a big shared apartment, and most eventually went home. There was a period of a few months where every other time the phone rang, I’d pick it up and be greeted by someone’s familiar Irish accent saying, invariably, “Amy, can ye do me a favor?” I loved them all, or at least I loved the guys; I didn’t get along quite as well with the women, for various reasons. But eventually, I took to paraphrasing Jesus’s “The poor you have always with ye” as “The Irish you have always with ye.”

But Simon was different. He’d been a fat, shy, unattractive teenager, and when I met him, he was still adjusting to his recent major weight loss that had left him gorgeous and left women chasing after him everywhere he went. He took advantage of the situation sometimes (for which I can’t blame him), and had a few meaningless flings, though alas, never with me. He and I were instant friends, though, and his shyness as well as his creative talent kept him from making a mess of things the way his friends did. He got an off-the-books job in an Irish bar and never asked me for money. :-) He applied to Cooper Union and was accepted with a full scholarship (Cooper Union is free for US citizens, but foreign students have to pay, and I gather it was fairly unusual for them to waive the fees, so they must have really liked Simon), and went back to Dublin to gather enough belongings to get him through the school year. As he was applying for his visa, they asked him if he’d been working while he was in the US, and being an honest and trusting sort, he said he had. It didn’t occur to him, I guess, that the fact that he’d been working illegally would have an adverse effect on his ability to get permission to return to the States. Needless to say, his visa was denied; they told him he could try again in a year, I think, but Cooper Union couldn’t guarantee that funding would still be available, so he gave up and went to Queens in Belfast instead.

So how is this an RTBC, you ask? Well, Simon Riley has always been an emblem for me of all the people from my past who I’m unlikely to ever see again, but whom I still think of fondly and will always wish well—and I imagine that if I ever cross his mind, Simon thinks the same way of me. Maybe he doesn’t; maybe he’s forgotten all about me. I know there are people in my past that I’ve forgotten; that sort of thing just happens sometimes. But I find it enormously comforting to think that there’s a sort of circle of people out there, people I never fell out with, just sort of moved on from because of time or geography or whatever reason, whom I wish well, and who wish me well. There are a lot of failed relationships (I don’t just mean romantic ones; I mean human relationships in general) in my past—more, I sometimes think, than most people have—and I sometimes tend to dwell on those. But when I think of people who will always have a little place in my heart, whom I will always wish good things for, and whom I’d love to see again if the opportunity arose, I feel happy and somehow peaceful. And this happens whenever Simon Riley pops into my head, as he does every few years or so.

Martha’s one of those people too, in a way, except that she and I have always stayed in at least sporadic touch and seen each other semi-regularly over the years. My friendship with her is like a lot of my friendships with people in my more recent past: not quite active, but not completely dormant either.

2. And thinking of Simon Riley made me think, through a series of mental jumps, of someone else from my past whom I almost never think of, even though in some ways I still think he and I were destined for each other: Kevin Cooney, the first boy I dated after I finally got over my obsession. (It’s not necessarily a positive, that destiny thing, and I’m pretty sure the way I felt about him wasn’t healthy, though I am sure it was love, love of the type the poets write about and some people never even experience. The fact that there seems to be an air of destiny about a relationship doesn’t mean that you actually should be together.)

Kevin was a massively troubled person (as I was, am too, of course) in myriad complex ways that I won’t even try to describe; that he was already showing alcoholic tendencies was practically the least of his problems. He was also beautiful, the nearest to the perfect embodiment of “my type” of any guy I’ve ever known. (He’d have had to be a little taller and have brown eyes to be the exact embodiment, but instead he had the most astonishing blue eyes I’ve ever seen, and I don’t usually like blue eyes on people, only on cats. You could have drowned in those eyes, though…) And he was arguably the smartest person I’ve ever met, or more accurately, the person who possessed the most of my type of intelligence (verbal/logical/linguistic rather than mathematical or technical or artistic). His brain was the thing that attracted me most (no, really). With my flair for melodrama, I envisioned us as Lillian Hellman and Dashiell Hammett, or some such college-girl vision of the perfect crazy-brilliant couple.

And then he abruptly broke off the relationship after a few months for no good reason except that I was too serious about it, and he was too scared to be that serious—not an unfamiliar setup for me in my younger years. The breakup was notable for me in that I consciously decided not to be traumatized by it and not to become obsessed with him, and I succeeded. I think I was afraid that if I thought too hard about what I was losing, I’d really go over the edge, so I just put it out of my mind. We actually stayed friends—somewhat uneasy friends, but friends nonetheless. A few months later, he decided to move to New Orleans, for no particular reason except that it seemed like a place where he could really ruin his life, since the bars are open all night, and I stopped thinking about him at all; as I remember, I didn’t even ask the mutual friend who’d introduced us about Kevin more than once or twice.

But I thought about Kevin this morning because thinking about Martha and that apartment reminded me of the morning that he called me at 7:30 a.m., after I hadn’t heard from him for months, and weirdly, exactly one year to the day after I’d met him (not that he’d have known that, but I did), and I suddenly found him back in town and back in my life. Martha and I had been to a show at Maxwell’s the night before and had been up till 5AM talking after the long trek home from Hoboken, and yet somehow she graciously decided to go home so that Kevin could come over. He came over, and he said things that sounded like I’d written the script for him: he hadn’t realized what a good thing he’d had with me, he hadn’t found anyone else like me and didn’t think he really would, and this time, he wasn’t going to get scared away—”and you can quote me on that.” When he inevitably did get scared away—inevitably and pretty foolishly, since I was two weeks away from moving to Austin for grad school—I did quote him on it, just to vent my frustration. I wasn’t heartbroken then, either; I was furious, furious at him for not being capable of being what he said he’d be, and even more furious at myself for falling for it.

But I moved on, literally in this case, and I stopped fussing about it pretty quickly as I got caught up in my new life in Austin. He called me there once or twice; I’ll never know why, exactly. And then I never heard from him again. Time passed, and I was able to think of him fondly and to wonder what became of him without any particular pain or passion. For years, I’d check the phone book every time I went home to see if there was a listing for him, but it’s not that uncommon a name, so there were usually several listings. I’ve even Googled him, with the same results. So I don’t know, and will probably never know, who he turned out to be, and I’ll always wonder just a tiny bit, every few years when he crosses my mind. Of my relatively small number of ex-boyfriends, he’s the only one that I’d be truly happy to see again—just to see, just to find out what he’s like and where he is and what he’s doing. But thinking of him, I remember only the good parts, and it makes me oddly happy.

3. A much shorter and more mundane RTBC: since next week is this semester’s on-campus session, I don’t have any homework this week, so I can use the time to catch up a little. I’ve already made good progress on catching up, but getting fully caught up will a) make my step a little lighter and b) give me time to maybe see a movie, or shop, or even clean the house a little bit, all of which would be fine things indeed.

4. (I’m whispering this one so the Fates won’t hear me.) There’s a potential, remote reason to be very cheerful possibly, maybe, just possibly lurking on the horizon…but that’s all I’m going to say about that for fear of jinxing it. (I’m not at all superstitious, except when I am.)

5. Basketball, as noted in my lengthy post about it from earlier in the week—and March Madness is just around the corner. I love, love, love March Madness. For the first four days, I watch basketball till my eyes glaze over; I watch teams from colleges I’ve never heard of; I put money in the office pool and agonize over my brackets; I become familiar with emerging great players I’ve never heard of and remember them in June when the draft comes along. It’s one of my favorite times of year, and it’s only a few short weeks away.

6. And finally, a late-breaking RTBC, courtesy of my friend Jim: he staged a Google fight of his own and found that love does, in fact, conquer awl. Best laugh of the week. I can’t resist a good bad pun.

*Incredible but true: I was listening to the LynxPod at work today to drown out some construction noise that was making my headache even worse, and “Pounding Pipes” came on—for the first time ever. No one will ever convince me that iPods don’t, in fact, have minds of their own.

Google Fight is the best (or worst, depending on your perspective) Web distraction I’ve come across in ages. (Curse you, Marcia!) It’s a very simple concept: you enter two words or phrases, then click for them to fight each other. Little animated stick figures engage in a brief fistfight, with one KOing the other, and the results appear; the winner is whichever keyword gets the most hits on Google. Simple, but totally addictive.

Among the things I’ve learned from Google fighting:

Good triumphs over evil.
Love beats money, though not by much.
Poor vastly outnumbers rich.
The Beatles best the Rolling Stones.
Wilco roundly defeats both Son Volt and Uncle Tupelo, but Jay Farrar whups Jeff Tweedy.
And alas, love does not conquer all. But reassuringly, time heals all wounds, or at least beats them up.

There are some interesting inconsistencies depending on wording and part of speech. For instance:
Dogs completely trounce cats, but cat beats dog.
Judaism loses out to both Islam and Christianity by a very large margin, but Jews are more popular than Jesus. (Joke, it’s a joke, don’t get offended.)
Christian outnumbers Islamic, but Islam handily beats Christianity.

Anyway, it’s dangerously distracting. As an antidote, I’m sending myself to Get Back to Work, which I learned about from Jamie’s blog and which I’ve actually been using quite a bit—for whatever reason (guilt, I think), it works well for me. Thanks, Jamie.


This
(scroll down till you get to the February 16 column) is a worthy read. And he’s right, completely…even though Carlee is an amazing dog.

It’s been an intriguing week in the world of basketball. (It’s been an interesting-in-a-good-way week in my world too—it’s amazing how much better I’m feeling, though I’m not sure that’s meds or therapy or my own conscious efforts at attitude adjustment or just the black fog of a severe depressive episode dissipating, as it always eventually does, or all of the above—but that’s a story for another day.) First, there was all-star weekend, the best one I’ve witnessed in at least four or five years. A great, close-until-it-wasn’t rookie-sophomore game, highlighted by the fearlessness of Josh Smith, Ben Gordon, and Dwight Howard in the face of the obvious greatness of LeBron, Melo, and company, made up for the disappointment of Emeka Okafor (my favorite rookie) not being able to play, and even the all-star game itself was exciting and competitive, relatively speaking (though CWebb and Brad Miller should have started, dammit).

And then the fun stuff:* Steve Nash (MVP of the season so far, for sure) squeaking by in the first round of the skills contest and then nailing the second round; a sloppy (and disappointingly, Peja-less) but suspenseful three-point contest; and of course, the return of the dunk. Nearly a week later, I’m still talking about those dunks. I love a good windmill slam more than any other kind of dunk, I think, and Josh Smith did those beautifully (and did Dominique proud), but his trick with Kenyon Martin was even better than the ‘Nique slam. I hope Smith gets traded to a real team rather than being doomed to near-invisibility on the Team That Time Forgot for the next few seasons; he’s showing all the signs of being a superstar in the making, but there hasn’t been a superstar to come out of Atlanta since…well, since ‘Nique, probably. (Someone feel free to correct me on that.) And Amare Stoudemire’s soccer slams, ably abetted by Steve Nash, were a delight; I wish the second one had worked the first time, but when it finally did work, it was almost as much fun as the first. Stoudemire and Nash are favorites of mine, and Phoenix has been such a pleasure to watch this year. They remind of the Kings teams of just a few years ago: fast, high-scoring, and fun, with a camaraderie that’s obvious. In fact, with the Kings playing unevenly and having now essentiallly given up on the season (more on that in a second) and the Wolves being too depressing to watch half the time, Phoenix are practically my favorite team this season. I’ll still root for the Wolves, but I don’t feel very optimistic about their playoff hopes unless they make some kind of smart trade today. (And I can’t help rooting for the Knicks, but let’s not talk about that; if questioned directly about it, I will deny all knowledge of any such team.) There are other teams I’m enjoying this year, but I think I’m going to be pulling for Phoenix when we get deep into the postseason.

Except that maybe now I’m going to be rooting for Philly. I’m still reeling from last night’s SportsCenter scoop—now confirmed, I guess—that Chris Webber is going to Philadelphia in exchange for, well, hardly anything. “Gobsmacked” may be the only word that can adequately describe my reaction, although “stunned” would do the trick too. My initial response, I admit, wasn’t, “Wow, it’s going to be exciting to see how (or if) CWebb and Iverson mesh,” but “What were the Kings thinking?” Why trade Webber now, when he’s finally playing up to his potential on a consistent basis? Is it the Peja thing? I dunno, Geoff Petrie’s always struck me as a smart exec, and I love love love Stojakovic, but he’s not the player you build the franchise around (especially since he’s going to be a free agent after this season). And yeah, Cuttino Mobley was a fantastic pickup, and yeah, Bibby’s improving all the time and will likely continue to do so for a while, and yeah, CWebb isn’t getting any younger and who knows how long he’ll stay healthy…but he’s healthy right now, and I can’t help thinking that this move scuttles any faint hopes the Kings might have had of advancing in the playoffs. Corliss “Bobby Jackson should have won the sixth man award instead of me the year I won it” Williamson and Kenny Thomas sure as hell ain’t going to make a serious difference in getting them there. And geez, way to dispel any remaining illusion of the Kings as the ultimate team-y team; I think the magic of the Kings’ camaraderie left with Vlade last year, but it’s beyond gone now, and I don’t see it coming back.

I was so baffled by the trade that I stayed up way later than I meant to waiting in vain for SportsCenter to provide some sort of analysis beyond, “Wow!” It wasn’t until this morning that I started to think about the upside. Iverson’s never had a true superstar alongside him, and it’s going to be really interesting to see how that works out. Webber and AI could be an incredibly exciting combination to watch. I’ve always liked Iverson (since he was a freshman at Georgetown, in fact) and I think he gets an unfairly bad rap both on and off the court; he is a ballhog, but I suspect a lot of that is because he’s had to be…and now he won’t have to be. The move could be great for him and—more important, to me at least—great for CWebb too.

Webber is maybe my second-favorite player in the NBA (okay, third, but with my beloved former Gopher Bobby Jackson out for the season, I’ll cede the #2 spot to Webber; #1 is KG, of course, and will be till the day he retires). I’ve admired him since he was the fabbest of the Fab Five. My college hoops rooting habits are kind of all over the map; I’ve rooted for Kansas for years, long before I ever set foot or even contemplated setting foot in the state, and I still root for them except when they play Mizzou, since I kind of have to be a Tigers fan by geography. The hometown team I’ve always cared most about is St. John’s, though I’ve been known to root for Seton Hall on occasion too, and nowadays I root for Manhattan, not only because their nickname is the Jaspers and my big blue-point Siamese mix boy is named Jasper but also because they’ve been improbably good for a couple of seasons now. But mostly, I’m a Big Ten girl; the height of my college hoops fandom came when I lived in Minneapolis, and the Gophers were competitive for most of the time that I lived there, so the Big Ten became my conference of choice. There are Big Ten rivals that I hate (Wisconsin and Iowa, of course; I couldn’t call myself a Gophers fan if I didn’t hate those teams with a deep and abiding passion, but also Ohio State and Purdue; I can’t hate Illinois anymore because a) I’m about to become an Illini alum, and b) their streak has been so amazing that it would be churlish to want it to end, but deep down I still hate them anyway). And there are Big Ten teams that I like in spite of their being rivals: Michigan and Michigan State. So I was crazy about the Fab Five, who were thrilling in their freshman year and continued to be likeable and admirable even though they never quite achieved what they were supposed to. And I’ve stayed loyal to Jalen “Handsomest Man in Basketball” Rose and Juwan Howard throughout their somewhat checkered NBA careers. But most of all, I love CWebb. I remember seeing him interviewed as a freshman, and even then, it was clear that he was a remarkably mature and introspective young man, not only more articulate than the average college athlete but also more poised and pensive. I always wondered if his head would get in his way, and I still wonder sometimes if it does. As an NBA player, he’s had his growing pains and moments of brattiness, and he hasn’t achieved quite as much as fans like me might have hoped. But I’ve remained a fan and an admirer, and I’ll always cheer for him, in Philly or wherever. I’m looking forward to seeing how this trade plays out for him and Iverson both.

(And in the midst of all this, my Gophers quietly won both their games this week. I think they might be officially off the bubble now. A win tomorrow would be the perfect end to a memorable basketball week.)

*I heard Stefan Fatsis, usually one of my favorite sports commentators, on NPR talking about how all-star weekend had become too much of a show, and suggesting that the NBA should follow the lead of baseball and the NHL (that’s the No Hockey League, of course) by finding a way to make the game mean something. I couldn’t disagree more. The “show” aspect of NBA all-star weekend is precisely what draws me in; the NBA is better than some other leagues at combining sports with entertainment, and all-star weekend is usually massively entertaining, even when the quality of play isn’t anywhere near as high as it was this year. I love to see the veterans turn out, see the players laughing and having a good time, see the seasoned players rooting their hearts out for their younger teammates in the various competitions…and of course, listen to my favorite sports analysts in the world, Ernie Johnson, Kenny Smith, and Charles Barkley, riffing endlessly on the whole thing. I watch the MLB all-star game because it’s there, but I don’t give it my full attention, because it’s basically a boring game unless there’s some young player who I’m particularly happy to see in his first all-star game. Mostly I just pay attention to make sure the American League wins, now that that determines home-field advantage in the Series. I watch the NBA all-star stuff because it makes me smile.

This site is fairly new, I guess, but what a great idea: they’re rating corporations based on political activity. At the moment, the only criterion they’re applying is 2003-04 political contributions, but it looks like they’re (somewhat ambitiously, since it’s an all-volunteer, contributor-supported site) hoping to apply a number of other criteria including business ethics, environmental impact, workers’ rights, and so on. Their database is pretty small so far, but still useful, and I’ll be keeping a close eye on their progress—and making a donation at some point too.

Of course, since I work for a company that gets a 14% rating from them, I can’t be too sanctimonious about my buying choices. And sometimes the choices aren’t so clear-cut; Petsmart gets a 0% rating because of relatively large campaign contributions to the Repugs, but Petco (which they don’t rate) has a terrible track record on animal welfare, and I think it’s easier for me to live with buying from a Republican-leaning company than from a company that does business with known animal abusers. But still, I’m glad to know what my choices are (and if there were any decent mom-and-pop pet food stores around, I’d gladly buy from them, but the ones in this town tend to be filthy and overpriced, and at least one of them that I’ve visited sells puppy-mill puppies). There aren’t a lot of big surprises on the list either, except maybe for some pleasant ones (Netflix gets a high rating, which I wouldn’t necessarily have guessed, and some unexpected companies like FootLocker and Crate and Barrel get very high ratings, e.g.). But I’m glad to have this information gathered in one place, and I look forward to seeing the site grow.

For the second year in a row, a dog I actually liked won the Westminster Kennel Club show. In both cases, it wasn’t my initial favorite even among the 7 Best in Show candidates, but it won me over completely during the final judging. Last year’s winner, Josh the Newfoundland, was just irresistible, and he was close to a perfect specimen of the breed (which is a breed I love, though I wouldn’t own one unless I lived in a much, much bigger house and had access to a lake or something). This year, I was rooting for the gorgeous border collie in the Best in Show competition, though I liked four of the dogs, an unusually high number for me: I would have liked the Tibetan terrier even if it hadn’t been a particularly good example of that sweet breed, just because I was so thoroughly delighted to see something other than a poodle come out of the Non-Sporting Group (more on this in a paragraph or four); the Great Pyrenees was quite lovely, and they’re such likeable dogs (though again, a breed I wouldn’t own) ; and the German shorthair pointer’s excellence was clear even in a very tough Sporting Group class. (I love that breed too, and I might even own one given the opportunity; I’ve never known one who was anything but thoroughly good and loveable and trainable.) But I was still rooting for the border collie, because it was a beauty and because I think border collies are amazing creatures, with their hypnotic stares and their preternatural intelligence. I once saw a demonstration at a fundraiser in St. Paul where a border collie herded a bunch of chickens, and I’ve been hooked on them ever since. Yet again, I don’t think I’d own one, at least not as long as I have cats (i.e., for the rest of my life), because a) I wouldn’t want the dog herding the cats around, and b) I’m not sure I’d have the time and energy to give the dog the opportunities to do herding work that it would need. (Plus sometimes they can be bitey.) But I’m in awe of them.

I don’t like to badmouth entire breeds of dogs, but I don’t particularly care for bloodhounds—and I’ve had a lot of experience with them, because I worked briefly for some private investigators who ran bloodhounds, among other dogs. Actually, it’s not so much that I dislike them, I just don’t find very much about them to like. They’re not interested in people in terms of companionship; they just want to track. And they have a particularly unpleasant doggy smell. And of all the lovely animals in the Hound group, the bloodhound seemed like a disappointing choice for Best in Group. (If I thought this blog was widely read, I’d be worried about hate mail from bloodhound afficionados, but that’s the nice thing about having a quasi-invisible blog.) As for the other two…well, I’ll grant that there’s something kind of amusing about the bizarre rolling gait of the Pekingese; I’m just not convinced they’re actually dogs. I think they’re either mops with faces, or else—and more troublingly—tribbles. I’m by no means a Trekkie, having never seen a single episode from any of the revival series, much less any of the movies, but I’m familiar enough with the original series to know that tribbles are not good things to have masquerading as dogs. And though I’m even more loath to badmouth entire groups of dog breeds than I am to badmouth individual breeds, I can say that with very few exceptions, I don’t like terriers…and I especiallly don’t like tiny bitey ill-tempered little terrier breeds like Norfolks and Norwiches and border terriers…and I really don’t like Coco, the little Norfolk terrier who seems to make it to every single Best in Show at Westminster. I was so afraid that she was going to win this year…

But then something happened when they got into the Best in Show ring. Carlee, the German shorthair, completely blew the competition away. To use a basketball term, she put on a clinic. I don’t remember ever seeing a dog that was so close to perfection in terms of the breed standard and just in terms of her carriage and stance and overall look. She was just plain magnificent, and I think it was obvious to everyone in the crowd, as well as the broadcasters (the expert guy, David Frey, had picked another dog—the bloodhound, maybe—as his likeliest winner before the judging started, but just before the winner was announced, he changed his pick to Carlee. Her free stack was awe-inspiring, and she was so intently focused on the judge and the handler, and it was just a stunning performance. I don’t think there was any real question who was going to win.

As a strong supporter of animal rights and welfare (but not an extremist supporter; I resent having to add that, because most people I know who believe that animals have rights are not the extremist type at all, but I know that lots of people perceive anyone who even associates themselves with the phrase “animal rights” must be an extremist, and it’s just not so), I have mixed feelings about purebred dog breeding and showing. Fundamentally, I guess, I can’t fully support the breeding of purebred dogs when there are so many unwanted dogs—purebred and mutt—out there. But I’m the stepmom of a purebred German shepherd and the former-and-forever mom of a purebred Keeshond, bought from a breeder (and lost to me as a result of the breakup of my first marriage), and I understand the appeal of purebred dogs: the predictability of personality, size, etc., is important if you have kids or cats or just want to know what you’re getting yourself into, and that can’t always be a certainty with a mutt adopted from a shelter, though if you adopt one as a puppy, you have a great deal to do with how the dog turns out. (And you can’t completely guarantee how a purebred pup is going to turn out either, of course.) I’m a cat person first and foremost, and largely because of that, I know I’ll continue to own purebred dogs when Bill’s dogs are gone, because I know that a purebred Keeshond is less likely to eat or otherwise interfere with my cats than a shelter mutt, much as I believe in shelter mutts. Ideally, I’d own both a mutt and a purebred Kees, but whatever happens, I’ll get the purebred from a rescue group, because that’s another way of avoiding the whole purebred-breeding issue, or at least making up for it somehow.

As for showing, that’s a mixed feeling too. I know there are people who dismiss it as a beauty contest, but given that purebred dogs aren’t going to cease to exist just because some people don’t believe in breeding them, I don’t really have a problem with maintaining the breed standard by showing them, even if it’s for the ultimate purpose of making them desirable breeding stock. There is something to be said for maintaining the standard, if you’re going to have purebred dogs at all. And the dogs that make it past their first show or two absolutely love the show circuit; I have no concerns about the way show dogs are treated, and it’s a wonderful way for owners or handlers to bond with the dogs. Me, I prefer obedience showing to conformation showing, because it’s more relaxed and more fun, and training a dog in obedience is so rewarding for dog and owner. But I don’t have that much of an issue with conformation showing, and I never miss a Westminster show on TV.

I did a ton of research on dog breeds before my first husband and I settled on the Keeshond, including spending a lot of time at dog shows, and though there are a lot of breeds that would have worked out for us and a number that I fell in love with (Belgian tervurens, Australian shepherds, Pembroke Welsh corgis, schipperkes, shiba inus…I could go on), the Keeshond was the breed that stole my heart and has never let go. I’m resigned to the fact that a Keeshond will never win Best in Show at Westminster and may never, in my lifetime, even emerge from the Non-Sporting Group, which is almost always dominated by either the miniature poodle or the standard poodle (and I love standard poodles, don’t get me wrong, they’re wonderful, intelligent, even-tempered dogs—I just don’t think they should be in the same group as less well-known and popular dogs like Keeshonden and Boston terriers and the like, which is why I was ecstatic to see the Tibetan terrier win the group this year). And this bothers me just a little, which is more than it should, because I want everyone in the world to know what thoroughly delightful dogs Keeshonden are. Then again, if they became popular, they might be subject to the same overbreeding that so many popular breeds have endured, so maybe it’s just as well. But if you don’t mind the hair (and that’s a major caveat, though to be fair, the German shepherd I live with sheds more in a day than the average Keeshond does in a month), they are the best dogs on the planet. Sweet, funny, loyal, a little stubborn, smart, loving, loveable (they’re more enthusiastic about receiving affection and attention than they are about giving it, but that just shows they’re discerning), independent, alert, relatively low-maintenance, adorable, and—especially when they’ve been groomed just a little—extraordinarily beautiful. And they’re good watchdogs, though not good guard dogs; they’re also apparently slightly intimidating to some people, because they have a wolflike/foxlike look. (I used to love it when people asked me if my Kees was a wolf hybrid. “Yes,” I always wanted to reply, “she’s actually a midget wolf with extra fur.” Keeshonden stand about 15 inches at the shoulder if they’re on the big side, and they’re kind of solidly built; they could only look like wolves if you’d never even seen a picture of a wolf.)

If I had to find any fault with them, other than the fact that they can be a little harder than some breeds to housebreak, it’s that they tend to be one-person dogs. Not that they don’t like other people; my Kees adored me, and was fiercely protective of me, and totally bonded to me, and saw me as her alpha dog. But she was Eric (my ex)’s dog at heart; I was the boss and I was her mom, but he was her playmate, her buddy, and there was no question of who would keep her when we split up. I’m sure she misssed me (in fact, I have empirical evidence that she did, though it’s painful for me to talk about), but if I’d kept her, she’d have been miserable without Eric. Losing her, and losing access to her, was maybe the worst thing of all the horrible things about my divorce (and I should note here that my divorce was a) instigated by me and b) quite civil, though not amicable; nonetheless, it was horrible and painful and I’m still enduring the repercussions, even though I don’t have any regrets about it. The plain fact is that divorce sucks no matter what), and I miss her all the time. I don’t even know if she’s still alive, because my ex doesn’t want any contact with me; she could be, because she’d be 14 and Keesies often live to be 15 or more. But I might never know, which breaks my heart.

There are other breeds that I might like to own; I’m very taken with Pembroke Welsh corgis and especially with Australian shepherds—I’ve known quite a few of the latter and loved them all. But even if many things about my future are big question marks these days—where will I live, what type of job will I have next, etc.—one of the few certainties is that I will own Keeshonden again someday. And that’s Keeshonden, plural (the proper Dutch plural, fwiw). They’re the best dogs in the world.

But I’ve digressed pretty far from the original point of this post, which is: Way to go, Carlee! Long may you flourish, you beautiful girl.

Yeah, I know, I haven’t been posting much, and I’m behind on my reasons to be cheerful,* which I had hoped to do weekly. Didn’t have that many as of Friday, though; it was a tough week at work and an unproductive week at home. My head is better overall—a lot better, really—but my energy level is so low that I can’t seem to do anything. I actually nodded off at work this morning, though fortunately it was right after I got here (at 7 friggin’ AM), so I don’t think anyone noticed.

Anyway…it was a pretty great Valentine’s Day nonetheless, and I can scrape up a few RTBC.

  1. Bill, after swearing up and down that he wasn’t getting me flowers for Valentine’s Day, sent me a bouquet of 40(!) gorgeous little roses (they’re not the miniature kind, but they’re not full-sized either) in various colors. They’re from the competition (even though I told him that I’d give him my employee discount code if he wanted to buy from my company), but they’re still pretty spectacular, and they were a big surprise. Not quite as much of a surprise as my other gift from him, though. We’re both huge fans of the brilliant (and possibly canceled) HBO show “The Wire,” which ranks among the best things I’ve ever seen on TV, and we both have a soft spot for the character of Omar, who robs drug dealers for a living and carries a sawed-off shotgun that he’s never shy about using, but also has a strong moral code of his own; for example, he never robs or shoots “civilians,” and he doesn’t swear. You can tell that the show’s creator, David Simon (who also created “Homicide,” another brilliant and long since canceled show), has a soft spot for Omar too; otherwise, he wouldn’t have made him such a compelling character (though I guess Omar is based partly on a couple of real Baltimore criminals whom Simon has encountered). And Michael K. Williams, a young actor who hasn’t done much else other than some guest appearances on various TV shows and some off-Broadway theater, does an extraordinary job bringing Omar to life.

    Anyway, the Baltimore alt weekly, City Paper, did a story on the show and its future recently, and Bill liked the illustration that went with it, which was a sort of free-form study of Omar, showing him with his trademark shotgun, money sticking out of his jacket pocket, and a TV remote in his hand. So—here’s the amazing part—Bill contacted the paper, who forwarded his e-mail to the artist, and he arranged to buy the original artwork. Then he hand-framed it for me. “Speechless” doesn’t even begin to describe my reaction (though I’m embarrassed to say that I didn’t recognize the illustration right away); I’ve never received a more creative gift or one that had so much thought put into it. “Stunned” would be closer to the mark. I Am a Lucky Girl.

    That alone would be enough for this week’s RTBC, but I’ve got some others.

  2. We had our Valentine’s Day dinner on Saturday night, since I knew I’d be studying on the actual night, and going out on Monday nights isn’t very appealing anyway, and decided to try out a newish Japanese place that’s closer to our house than the excellent place that we usually visit for our periodic sushi indulgences. (Whenever we eat sushi lately, we keep having people in the restaurants marvel at our capacity for it—but when you only eat it a few times a year, it’s hard not to splurge.) It wasn’t as good as our usual place, or even as good as the place way far away from our house that we went to with friends a while back, but it was quite good nonetheless, and the atmosphere of the place was a lot of fun. We sat at the sushi bar and listened to the head sushi chef bantering with the regulars. It was also cheaper than our usual place, so I have a feeling we’ll go back. I have mixed feelings about eating fish, since I’d prefer to be a real vegetarian, and I go back and forth about whether I eat it or not (currently I don’t), but somehow I’ve always been able to make an exception/justification for sushi. Actually, “justification” isn’t the right word, because I can’t think of any reason that it’s acceptable under my moral standards to eat fish—hell, I don’t even wear leather. I’m just powerless to resist the occasional urge for sushi.
  3. I got my proposal for the term paper for my advanced cataloging class done in time, and I think it even sort of made sense; more important, I think I’ve actually got a handle on the topic, which I was having trouble pinning down. It’s going to be (nonlibrarians may take a brief nap now) a look at how Dublin Core metadata might either replace or supplement MARC21 in the library catalog—not only for cataloging digital resources, but also for plain old bibliographic cataloging. I came to cataloging bass-ackwards, after a metadata class that was hands down the best class I’ve ever taken in any phase of my education, and I was smitten with Dublin Core and deeply suspicious of and baffled by MARC when I took the intro cataloging class. Now I’m more aware of the limitations of Dublin Core (though I still love it for its ease of use and its “flexibility and extensibility,” to use those tired buzzwords) and more aware of the advantages of MARC…though I’m ambivalent about MARC; on the one hand, the linguist part of me is drawn to the idea of librarians having their own secret, arcane language, especially now that I’ve learned to speak it on a basic level, but on the other hand, I think that arcane aspect of it is what’s going to doom it to some extent in this digital age. Anyway, the proposal is done, and the paper doesn’t seem insurmountable. (On the down side, I’m behind in the reading for my IA class and I’ve done absolutely nothing on my independent study project, but hey, this post is supposed to be upbeat and positive.)
  4. My copy of “Dap-Dippin’…with Sharon Jones and the Dap-Kings” finally showed up yesterday. It took forever to get here—I get tired of buying stuff from Amazon, and my favorite online retailer didn’t have it, but I don’t think I’ll be buying again from the legendary indie retailer from which I ended up purchasing it any time soon—but it got here, and I’m listening to it now and it’s just knocking me flat. I love the retro packaging, and more important, I love the way Ms. Jones and band manage to make their vintage soul influences clear without sounding self-consciously retro. The lyrics, production, and overall style are thoroughly up-to-date…though if you close your eyes and pretend you’re not listening on a computer, you can sort of imagine you’re listening to a late 1960s/early 1970s Detroit soul record. Killer stuff, and I’m kicking myself now for not driving to Lawrence on Friday night to see her.
  5. Without going into any details that might get me in trouble, I’ll just say that I’m finally going to get a legitimate chance to work on something at work that will make actual use of the skills I’ve been spending the last couple of years (and thousands of dollars in student loans) acquiring. I’m not sure where to start with it—details will become clearer next week—but I’m as excited about it as I’ve been about anything job-related since I left the Wonderful World of Children’s Publishing.

OK, I think that’s enough for this week. I’ve got a bunch of assignments due this week, so it may not be much of a week for blogging, but I still have a post brewing in my head about traditional Celtic and British Isles music (I’m thinking of making a comp called “A Decade or So of Celtic Music That Doesn’t Suck,” but I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t get any takers for that one.), and maybe I’ll manage that on Thursday or so.

*In case anyone is curious about where the phrase “Reasons to Be Cheerful” comes from or why it will always be “part 3,” it’s from a very wonderful song by the late great Ian Dury. The closest approximation I could find to what I think the real lyrics are is here; unfortunately, it’s a site with popups, but the usual big lyric aggregator sites got the first line wrong, so I didn’t bother with them after that.

…sort of. I love this. Makes me want to visit Tasmania.

Strathaven folk knit themselves a room :: ABC Tasmania

(Thanks to Erika for sending me the link.)

One of the weird things about my particular brand of depression is that somewhere in my late 20s/early 30s, in spite of going through some moderate to severe depressive episodes, I became and remained a (mostly) unshakeable optimist — and one of the things that’s been most disconcerting about this latest and worst round of severe depression (which is plainly ebbing, but not all the way gone yet) has been the total disappearance of that optimism. And I’d like to bring it back. So, inspired by the late, great Ian Dury, I’m going to try to make a weekly list of things that have given me moments of pleasure and/or hope in the past week or few days or morning drive to work or whatever. Here’s the first attempt.

1. My classes this semester. I’m finding my advanced cataloging class a little more challenging than expected, but that’s not a bad thing at all: it’s invaluable to find out how much I don’t know, and how much more I want and need to learn. And I get almost giddy in my information architecture class, because the professor is so good, the discussion is lively, and it’s surprising and reassuring to find how much I know already. I might actually be able to get a job in it someday, which is cause for optimism for sure.

2. Getting the new Bettie Serveert record *and* the X “Unheard Music” DVD in the mail this week. The Bettie Serveert record showed up yesterday, so I’m listening to it for the first time now. I’m on track 5, and so far it’s sounding almost as good as Log 22. First impression two tracks in was that it was a little poppier and maybe less adventurous than Log 22, but now I’ve hit a couple of longer, slower songs, including one that had a slightly orchestral feel that reminded me just a little of the Delgados. (I never miss an opportunity to mention the Delgados, who got a brief but audible bit of exposure on “The O.C.” last night. I don’t watch the show, but a friend had alerted me that the Delgados would have a song featured in a scene in last night’s episode. Bill watches it devoutly (he watches a lot of shows that have teenage girls as their main target audience; I’m not sure what this means, but I can’t tease him too much about “The O.C.” because a) I watch reality shows on MTV, not to mention “Joan of Arcadia”, and b) “The O.C.” seems to be pretty well-written and entertaining, based on the glimpses of it I’ve caught), and he called me in when the song — “Everybody Come Down,” a fine choice — came on.)* It’s weird to refer to the Betties — a band that I’ve followed for more than 10 years — as reminding me of the Delgados, a band I only found out about a couple of years ago. But there it is. Up to track 6 now and still sounding excellent.

I also got the new Low record in the mail this week. Haven’t had a chance to listen to it yet, but My Favorite DJ played another track from it yesterday that I liked a lot, so I think it’s going to be a keeper. Which may mean hell has frozen over, I’m not sure.

3. A new season of “Murphy’s Law” and a new (to the U.S.) mystery series on BBCAmerica that’s one of the best shows I’ve seen in a while. They’re calling it “Night Detective” here; its UK title was “55 Degrees North,” which I guess they thought wouldn’t mean anything to USians. (Though I’m not sure the average Brit knows what latitude various cities are either, but maybe they do; 55 degrees N is Newcastle, among other places, and that’s where the show is set.) There’s only been one episode so far, but it was excellent, both because of the premise (smart, sharp, successful and slightly flash senior London detective is transferred to Newcastle for reasons so far unrevealed, and has to battle to earn respect and recognition in his new post — including the superior officer who seems determined to keep him on nights instead of the day shifts he needs to earn that respect and recognition) and because of the star, a guy named Don Gilet who was apparently in a very successful UK series called “Babyfather” but whom I’d never seen before. He’s perfectly cast, and pretty riveting to watch. (And also quite hot, though that has nothing whatsoever to do with my appreciation of his acting.)

The second season of “Murphy’s Law” started out on an unexpectedly dark note, when spoiler alert







,,,
his gorgeous boss, with whom he was just starting a relationship, was killed off in the first few minutes, and if the first episode is any indication, the show may be a little darker and less just darkly funny this season, which would be okay, I guess. The series was created by Colin Bateman, a clever and very funny (darkly funny) mystery novelist turned screenwriter who’s a Northern Irish Prod, as is the lead character in the show, Murphy (played by James Nesbitt, for whom Bateman apparently wrote the part — I think Nesbitt’s a Northern Irish Prod himself, in fact), and it was good but a little unsatisfying in its first season, because Murphy teetered on the edge of self-parody so much of the time. That was necessary sometimes because he’s an undercover cop, but I thought they overdid it at times. Still, it was good enough to keep me interested, and I think I’ll enjoy the new season more.

4. Starting a new knitting project last night: a hat that lands just on the right side of the line between fun and silly-looking. I hadn’t done any knitting in a couple of weeks, but when I saw this pattern on my pattern-a-day knitting calendar (which has been something of a disappointment overall so far), I realized that I had no desire to finish the hat I was knitting just for practice, my first on circular needles — so last night I frogged it and started the new one. It’s in the purply-blue colorway of eyelash yarn that I had left over from my security-blanket scarf, and I think it’s going to go relatively fast and look pretty cool. Should be done just in time for me not to need a hat for the rest of the season.

5. Managing to miss pretty much all pre- and post-State of the Union punditry and pontificating (as well as the speech itself, of course) by observing a total news blackout Tuesday through Thursday.

6. Realigning my relationship with the online universe, at least temporarily, because I needed to quit letting online snits on my part or others’ get to me, and also in order to concentrate more on work and school. (Taking my job more seriously doesn’t make me like it any better, but it does make me feel less guilty and generally better about myself.) So far, it’s doing good things for my self-esteem, because I really am getting more done, and because avoiding social contact for the most part is sometimes good for me when I need to pull back and stop worrying about how people are perceiving me. I’d like to keep it up for as much of the semester as I can, though we’ll have to see how successful I am at that. I’ll have more to say about this later, I think; for now, I’ll just say that I’m not disavowing the very real friends and friendships I’ve formed online, just saying that I need a break from obsessive e-mailing and e-mail-checking for now, and for the foreseeable future.

7. Finding out that the Gophers beat Michigan quite handily this week — I’d have been happier if I could have actually seen the game, but they’re not exactly getting a lot of national TV exposure this season. This Gophers team isn’t blessed with all that much genuine talent, far as I can tell, so they’re actually kind of overachieving this season — in spite of the mediocre coaching of Dan “Why Haven’t They Fired Me Yet?” Monson — and that makes me happy. Sometime I’ll try to explain why the Gophers mean so much to me and probably always will, but if I did that now, it would get me a little teary-eyed, which would contradict the RTBC theme.

8. Hearing enough of the Earlimart and Reigning Sounds records on the LynxPod to determine that I do like both bands; I hadn’t been quite sure before. The Reigning Sound record (Too Much Guitar) is kind of inconsistent, but overall I like it and want to hear their other records. I’m slightly more enthusiastic about Earlimart, I think; the record that’s on the ‘Pod (can’t remember title right now) is one of their, um, earlier ones, but I’ve also heard songs from their most recent one that I really loved, so I think they could be a band I could actually get excited about, maybe. It’s always cheering to find a band (new or just new to me) that I can get excited about. And I heard a track by the Gentleman Callers, a St. Louis band, on Memphis to Manchester yesterday and was crazy about it, so there’s another one to explore. (I’ve also been seriously digging another recent discovery, a wonderful Irish singer named Cara Dillon — more on her, and on Celtic/UK traditional music, some other time.)

9. Figuring out where the CD version of my Sandy Denny boxed set probably is, even though I haven’t actuallly found it yet, and learning that there’s another Richard Thompson box coming out sometime soon (a 4-disc one that, based on the description I read, will be more representative of his entire career than the previous box, Watching the Dark, was; I didn’t have as many quibbles about that box as some people did, but it did have some major gaps).

So those are the RTBC for today; I can’t say that my mood is particularly cheerful yet, but I’m at least having moments of cheerfulness and finding things to be cheerful about, and that’s progress. I could actually come up with more, but I’ve spent a long time on this post already, and I’ll be contradicting #6 above if I keep at it much longer. There’s work to do, and I’ll feel better when it’s done, so off I go.

*Parentheses within parentheses and a footnote–beat that, Jamie! :-)

I’ve plugged Michael Berube’s blog before, but apparently he didn’t get enough votes to be a semifinalist for any awards in the Koufax Awards, so I’ll do my bit to get him a little bit more attention, at least among the three people who read my blog.

Education Secretary Demands Removal of Vermont from Nation’s Textbooks had me laughing so hard I had to close the fake screen of my cube for a few minutes. He doesn’t do satirical writing exclusively, but when he does it, he’s completely brilliant at it.